Showing posts with label incendiary fires. Show all posts
Showing posts with label incendiary fires. Show all posts

Thursday, July 9, 2015

DPS Inspector and Investigator Unable to Comment

Thomas J. Hinze
On July 7, at 12:41 a.m. (Indo-china time) I received the following response from Mr. Scott Radke, from the Minnesota State Fire Marshal Division, to my emails (quoted in the previous post). I'd first sent the email on June 15, then after receiving no reply for 3 weeks, I resent it on July 6.
Anyway, here's the reply I received on July 7:
  
To

Monday, June 15, 2015

Two Sheriffs Don't Care to Comment

Tom Hinze
 In my last post I included the text of the email I sent both to Sheriff Ross Litman (St. Louis County, MN), and to Sheriff Kelly Lake (Carlton County, MN), asking about the strange Cloquet "arson fire" of July 6, 2012. 
Actually, the last post included the text of the FIRST email I sent to both Sheriffs, on May 22, 2015. As I didn't receive any answer whatsoever, I re-sent the same email to both individuals on the first of June.
As of June 15, I've still received no answer from either of them, and I guess I can safely assume that I won't.
I've therefore sent the following email to two Fire Reporting officials from the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, namely, Mr. Scott Radke, who is listed on the DPS website as "Incident Reporting Inspector", and Mr. Richard Sellman, who is listed as "Investigator".
You may notice that the latter part of the email below is just a copy and paste of the same old email I wrote to the two Sheriffs. I'm getting a little tired of trying to put the same simple questions into new words!
I've already received an automated reply from Mr. Radke, as follows: 
Out of the Office - Returning Monday 6/22, Response maybe delayed
-Thanks Scott Radke
Hopefully, Mr. Sellman will be able to give us some information before next week, but if not, we'll just have to wait for Mr. Radke to return. 
It's damned funny that neither of the Sheriffs would know anything about this matter, though, eh? Duluth Police Chief Gordon Ramsay let me know that the Langenbrunner murder was not a Duluth case, and so he doesn't know anything about it ... It WAS a St. Louis County case, though -- I distinctly remember Sheriff Litman giving a press conference proudly announcing the "solving" of it.
Below is the correspondence I sent earlier today to the State Fire Marshal's investigator and inspector at the Minnesota Department of Public Safety:
 Lloyd Wagner


Friday, May 22, 2015

Still Digging on That "Arson Fire"

 It's been a while since I posted on this blog. I've been busy trying to wrap up the academic term at the University, writing and grading final exams, etc. And no information seems to fall directly into my lap, any more than does money or luck.
However, a week ago or so the Duluth News Tribune published an article about a special arson-detecting dog from the Cloquet Area Fire District that "assists authorities across the Midwest". Though that dog didn't come to them until 2013, I sent a couple of emails to the Fire Chief of the Cloquet Area Fire District, to ask about the reported arson fire of July 6, 2012. 
Below is my second email, and Mr. Shroeder's reply.

From: Lloyd Wagner [mailto:lewagner2002@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 2:30 AM
To: kschroeder@cloquetafd.com
Subject: followup query on Cloquet arson fire
Dear Mr. Schroeder:
I sent you an email a few days ago about an "arson fire" that was reported in the media to have been set by Sandra Couture on July 6, 2012 at the house of a Cloquet resident, and responded to by Carlton County sheriff's deputies.
Sandra Couture was accused of having set this fire to intimidate some unnamed witness in the Trina Langenbrunner murder case.
I pointed out that unlike any other fire, this fire did not appear anywhere in the media until AFTER it was reported "solved" by St. Louis County investigators, and that this fire doesn't show up in any Carlton County fire statistics, anywhere.
I thought that since you are the Cloquet District Fire Chief, you would be the person to ask for an explanation of this anomaly, or who would be able to suggest someone else I might ask instead.
I'd like your comment to post on the blog I've been writing relating my testimony in the Trina Langenbrunner murder, which I linked to in my previous email. Here again are the links which relate most directly to that reported fire:
I realize you're probably busy, and I'll wait for another day or two to proceed.
Thank you again for your time and interest in this matter.
Sincerely,
Lloyd Wagner
 
Kevin Schroeder

Mr. Wagner,
 
I have looked into our records, and based on the limited information that you have provided, I can find no record regarding the fire you refer to on July 6, 2012 in the CAFD system.  Please keep in mind that there is a large area that has a “Cloquet” mailing address  that is not served by our department.  We routinely get inquiries for incidents that occurred at a Cloquet mailing address that lie outside of our response area and are served by other fire departments in both Carlton and St. Louis Counties.  Your email lists a response by Carlton County Sheriff’s deputies, but an investigation by St. Louis County investigators.  This would lead me to believe the fire was North of the CAFD protection area in St. Louis County, and would have been handled by any of a number of volunteer fire departments in that area.   Based on what you have provided me, it appears the best contact would be the investigating officers in St. Louis County.  They would have the information on whose jurisdiction the fire occurred in.
 
I am sorry I could not provide more detailed information on any incident on July 6, 2012.
 
Kevin
 
 
CAFDlogo.JPGKevin Schroeder, District Fire Chief
2801 Dewey Avenue, Cloquet, Mn 55720
218-499-4274 | Fax 218-499-4289
www.Cloquetareafiredistrict.com
After receiving this prompt response, I asked Mr. Shroeder further: Who in Carlton County would have been responsible for reporting the total fire statistics to the Minnesota Department of Public Safety? ... but almost immediately after having asked that question I decided instead to follow the advice that Mr. Shroeder had already given me, and to contact the St. Louis County Sheriff's Department.
Those of you who have been reading this blog may laugh, because obviously, I've come full-circle, here -- the FIRST contact was to the St. Louis County Sheriff's Department, way back in 2001, and I've gone several 10's of thousands of miles since then!
However, this time, I've sent the same email to two Sheriffs' Departments, both St. Louis County, and to Carlton County. I hope that between the two, I can at least get this "arson fire" nailed down solid. The email which I will send just before I post this, is below, with the subject, "Cloquet arson fire of July 6, 2012", which for some reason I can't seem to paste as part of the email.

Dear Sheriff Litman and Sheriff Lake:
I thought it would be easier to send the same email to both of you.
I have some questions about the arson fire reported in the media as having occurred in Cloquet on July 6, 2012, (the one that was confessed to by Sandra and Joseph Couture in St. Louis County Court, as a tampering with unnamed witnesses in the Trina Langenbrunner murder case.)
I noticed a few things about this reported fire that raised questions in my mind, and I ask for your response:
1. It was the first fire I can ever remember that was not reported anywhere in the media the very next morning after it happened, but was only reported a couple of weeks later -- AFTER it had been solved by St. Louis County investigators (based on their having broken a code used in the jail between Sandra and Joseph Couture). 
2. It was reported that the fire was responded to by "Carlton County deputies", but when I looked up fire statistics for incendiary fires in Carlton County for 2012, the total damage reported for seven incidents was $8,600. This despite the fact that the one fire in question had reportedly destroyed a house, plus two vehicles, plus two dogs (who left no skeletons, but were "missing and presumed dead" in the fire).
3. I recently wrote to Mr. Kevin Shroeder, Fire Chief of the Cloquet Area Fire District, who told me that according to his records, no fire took place in that district on that date, nor on July 19, when Molotov cocktails were also reported to have been thrown at the same address, (and also responded to by Carlton County deputies). Mr. Shroeder pointed out that there are some addresses in St. Louis County that do have Cloquet addresses, and also some Cloquet addresses in Carlton County that are out of the Cloquet Area Fire District.
     A. If the fire was indeed in Carlton County, but out of the Cloquet Area Fire District, then it seems it should have shown up in the Carlton County report as an incendiary fire in 2012.
     B. If the fire actually took place in St. Louis County, then it seems it should have been responded to by some St. Louis County fire department, instead of by "Carlton County deputies", as reported.
5. Why would the address of the fire be kept secret from the public? In fear that the Coutures might find out? That of course makes no sense, because if they really did burn a house, they must have known where it was. (!)
6. Which entity initially investigated and made the official determination that the July 6, 2012 fire was an arson fire?
7. Was this fire reported to the Minnesota Department of Public Safety as a St. Louis County fire statistic for July 6, 2012, or as a Carlton County fire statistic? How about the Molotov cocktails that were thrown on July 19, 2012? Why can't I find either of these fires in any Northland news reports anywhere, until in August 2012?
Sheriff Litman may recall that I have repeatedly offered testimony regarding a certain person who met every criteria the Sheriff's Department said they were looking for in the case, since 2001. My testimony has been ignored, and I have even been called a liar in this case, without any DNA data ever being presented to attempt to PROVE me a liar. St. Louis County investigators refused to DNA test the person I pointed at, or to investigate other forensic [information] I pointed at. Instead, they let the guy know that I was talking about him, which caused him to threaten MY life. Then he was given a very short sentence in NERCC (just across the road from where I used to live) for his umpteenth DWI, and released right back into the rural wooded neighborhood, despite my complaints he had threatened my life.
I've repeatedly attempted to get my testimony into the official record and in front of a jury, and have not been able to do so. For that reason, I started a blog several months ago, to relate that testimony and to present the text of all letters and other communications I have regarding the case.
This email will appear as part of the next post in that blog, and any reply (or lack of reply) I receive to it will be subsequently reported, as well.
Here are the blog links that relate most directly to that reported fire of July 6, 2012.
I thank both of you for your time,
Sincerely,
Lloyd Wagner
I will be sending the above email shortly, then polish this post up a little, before I publish it.
Thanks for reading, and please stay tuned.
 

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

Letter to Sandra Couture





The below is self-explanatory. I will be mailing it as soon as I can get to the post office, and will then update this post to tell the date I actually mailed it. Today's date is March 10, 2015. This is the actual text of the letter I will be mailing. On the bottom is a screenshot of Sandra Couture's DOC Offender Locator page.
As reported two posts back, the DOC refuses to give me Joseph Couture's address, so I cannot write to ask him why he confessed to a crime without the Prosecutor presenting any evidence or sworn testimony in a courtroom showing that he actually committed the crime. 

From: Lloyd Wagner
24 Thamrong Prasit Road #8
Nai Muang, Amphur Muang
Nakhon Phanom, Thailand 48000

Sandra Kay Couture
OID# 240974
MFC Shakopee
1010 West 6th Avenue
Shakopee, MN 55379 U.S.A.
March 10, 2015
Hello Sandra Couture,
                I’m writing to you because back in August 2000 I witnessed a pair of size 11 or 12 New Balance shoes on a former neighbor of mine in Twig, MN, named Thomas (Tom) J. Hinze. In addition, Tom Hinze was driving a black Chrysler minivan the last week in August 2000, in addition, Tom Hinze told me that he had taken my vehicle from my yard the week of the Langenbrunner murder, in addition, Tom Hinze told me that he had burned clothing in a woodstove the week of the Langenbrunner murder, in addition, Tom Hinze left town shortly after the Langenbrunner murder, in addition, Tom had a reputation for violence and a bad attitude toward women (especially “Indian women”, he compared them to “animals”).
                I wasn’t much of a newspaper reader back in 2000. In addition, my mother died in the fall of 2000, my father and I were very busy working on publishing a book in the fall of 2000, and there were many other things going on, as well. Also, I knew first hand that Tom Hinze’s minivan had been in impound the night of the Langenbrunner murder, so I never even considered that it could have been him, until I read a full year later that the Sheriff was looking for the size 11 or 12 New Balance shoes, and I started putting 2 and 2 together.
I have repeatedly told the Sheriff’s Department about all of this information, but they have repeatedly refused to DNA-test Mr. Hinze, or to even look at the woodstove or the car that Tom told me he had “borrowed”. The Sheriff’s Department said I was “looking for a reward”, and wouldn’t even investigate. (Tom Hinze died in October 2013 and I’m still saying the same as I said years ago, so I’m not “looking for a reward”.)
                When I read that Joseph had been arrested for the murder, I also sent all of this information to the Public Defender’s office, and though they confirmed to me that Tom Hinze had never been DNA-tested, they didn’t seem to think it was at all important, nor did they make any insistence that the Prosecutors come up with any DNA proof to show that Joseph did the crime. They just accepted his “confession” without requiring any forensic evidence or any sworn testimony from any witnesses. As you know, all the Prosecutors had to back their story was an unnamed witness, and that witness is STILL unnamed.
                I have also checked all over the Internet to see about that July 6, 2012 “arson fire” that you and Joseph both “confessed” to. There was no fire ever reported in Cloquet, or anywhere else in Carlton County on July 6, 2012, until AFTER they had charged you with setting one. And then they never said where the fire was, because I guess they didn’t want you or Joseph to know whose house it was, though according to them, you already DID know, or why else would you go set it on fire??
That’s the only case in history that I can find, that a fire supposedly burned a house and two vehicles, plus killing two dogs that never left any skeletons, but were “missing and presumed dead”, that never made it into the newspaper the very next morning. In fact, ALL fires are reported the next morning, except for that one! There WAS NO fire reported on July 6, in Cloquet.
                Also, did you know that the official Minnesota fire statistics for 2012 reported a TOTAL of $8,600 damage for ALL “incendiary fires” in Carlton County in ALL of 2012?
                I am so irritated at being called a liar in this case, and my testimony being covered up and ignored, and also, my life was threatened by Tom Hinze, that I have started a blog on the Internet about this, and am digging out every bit of information I can find. I’ve published all of the above on the blog, plus a lot more. It’s called “Trina Langenbrunner Case Solved?”
                I have your address from the Minnesota Department of Corrections Prisoner Locator website – you are listed as MnDOC Offender ID 240974, at Shakopee, and I have thoroughly checked into the way to address letters to prisoners.  I will post a copy of this letter on the blog before I mail it to you,  – and I will mail at least 2 copies, a few days apart. The Thai postal system is very reliable, and my family in the U.S. and I have even sent cash through it from time to time. Not a single one of our letters has failed to get through in either direction – but as I have found when I attempted to get Joseph’s mailing address from the Department of Corrections, they refused to give it to me, as he is “serving his sentence out of state” and it is “DOC policy” to not give out his address.
I suspect that they may try to “deep-six” any letter I send to you, too, or try to dictate your reply, or whatever … but I would like to hear and report your story of whatever it was that caused you to confess to setting a fire that according to all the evidence, never even happened.  And please send me Joseph’s mailing address too, if you have it, or any other info you might be able to give me on what went on to induce you to “confess” in this case.
Mail takes about 10-12 days, each way. I will post this on my blog, before I actually mail it – then I will post the date that I actually mail it – and then I will wait for roughly a month for a reply. I will then post whatever reply I get, with my comments, or I will report that I have not received any reply.
Whatever is the case.

Good luck,


Lloyd Wagner

Below are the 2 screenshots of the Offender Locator, as of today, March 10, 2015. 
Thanks for reading, and please stay tuned.




Friday, January 16, 2015

Confession to Murder



This post will consist mostly of two newspaper articles (indented, below) relating Joseph Couture's confession to the murder, plus aiding and abetting arson and aiding and abetting the tampering with a witness charges. My comments on those articles are in red font. I will also post screen shots of Joseph Couture's Department of Corrections Offender Locator, and of the court records of both Joseph and Sandra Couture, regarding all of the charges. The newspaper articles are for educational purposes. The screen shots are of public records that anyone can find by doing a search.


(Carlton County Pine Journal)
Published July 26, 2013, 01:31 PM
It took him nearly 13 years to admit it, but before a full St. Louis County courtroom, Joseph John Couture testified today that he beat and stabbed Trina Louise Langenbrunner to death on Sept. 3, 2000.
Couture, 42, of Cloquet pleaded guilty to intentional second-degree murder, first-degree aiding and abetting aggravated witness tampering, and aiding and abetting first-degree arson.
Judge Dale Harris accepted the plea agreement reached between the defendant and the St. Louis County Attorney’s Office and immediately sentenced Couture to nearly 40 years in prison.
Under terms of the plea agreement, Couture was sentenced to 386 months in prison on the murder conviction and 86 months in prison for the witness-tampering conviction, to be served one after the other. He was sentenced to 129 months in prison on the arson conviction, to be served at the same time as the murder conviction. (Comment from Lloyd Wagner, 1-12-2015: When I first looked Joseph Couture up on the Department of Corrections Offender Locator in November 2013, his “Controlling sentence” was listed as “aiding and abetting tampering with a witness”, and homicide wasn’t even mentioned. Then all of a sudden, the Locator site went down, and when it came up again, Couture’s info had changed. Though homicide is mentioned, now, his sentence isn’t anywhere near 39 years. And, now he’s not in a DOC facility, at all. He may be in some facility out of state, per his own request, according to a later article. There is a caseworker mentioned, and a phone number (see screen shot below. You can enlarge any of these screen shots by either left or right-clicking on them, and following your browser's instructions.)




However, when I asked someone to call the phone number listed for the case worker in that screen shot, that person reported that whoever answered the phone seemed annoyed and said he didn’t know anything at all about the case.
I emailed that person back with what I saw as 3 possibilities: “Either the website is wrong, or the guy is lying, or he isn't performing his duty whatsoever. It HAS to be one of those. You just took "No, I don't know anything about it" for an acceptable answer??”
That person came up with a 4th possibility: “[Maybe] what he meant was "I am overworked and underpaid. I don't need more work. I have too much on my plate already." This is not an admirable attitude but can happen with jaded govt workers in this field.”
I almost feel sorry for the "jaded govt worker" with "too much on his plate already", the poor guy. If he doesn't want to do his job, he ought to resign it.
There’s no use in me calling the “Case Worker” number from Thailand, that’s for sure. I’ve thought of emailing the address given to ask for information, but if I did get an address, I still don’t know what I would do with it. Any correspondence by letter could easily be coerced, as I am convinced the “confession” itself was. The prisoner needs a visit in person, preferably with an attorney for backup, and it is impossible for me to drive from Thailand to wherever those people are locked up. For right now, I’ll just continue pointing out the anomalies in the case, and hope that someone in a better position than I take interest and join in. I have recently emailed a retired person who actually worked on the case, and I am waiting for his answer. I'll give him a couple of weeks, and then report on that.)
Assistant St. Louis County Attorneys Jessica Smith and Jon Holets prosecuted the case. Public defender Cynthia Evenson represented Couture. (Comment from Lloyd Wagner, 5-26-2014: It doesn't seem that the Public Defender (“Public Pretender”, in local lingo) ever required any sworn testimony of witnesses, or any physical evidence, whatsoever, from the Prosecutors. Just a little over one week after I wrote a long email to the Public Defender’s investigator Ron Taggart detailing MY testimony, Couture’s “confession” suddenly came up. Coincidence, perhaps. Was Couture even informed of my testimony??)
Langenbrunner, a 33-year-old mother of three, last was seen hitchhiking in the area of Brookston Road between 1:30 and 2 a.m. on Sept. 3, 2000. Couture was a neighbor of Langenbrunner at the time. The victim’s beaten and stabbed body was discovered off a rural road in southern St. Louis County.
St. Louis County Attorney Mark Rubin read a prepared statement outside the courthouse after the hearing. He said his office credited the "unwavering commitment of law enforcement in the successful prosecution of this case. The St. Louis County Sheriff's Office and Bureau of Criminal Apprehension are to be commended for a a job well done. Their compassionate perseverance ensured a just conclusion for this family and community," he said.
Trina Louise (St. Germaine) Langenbrunner was born Sept. 12, 1966, in St. Paul and attended Humboldt High School there. She was a member of the Fond du Lac Band of Ojibwe and worked as a home health aide while living in Cloquet.
Tags: news, crime, courts


Here is the second article, (offered for educational purposes), with my comments in red font.

After 13 Years, Minn. Man Admits Killing Woman, Setting Fire
MARK STODGHILL
DULUTH NEWS TRIBUNE
CREATED: JULY 27, 2013
In an attempt to intimidate a witness, Joseph Couture and his girlfriend burned down the house of a relative.
July 27--It took him nearly 13 years to admit it, but before a full St. Louis County courtroom, Joseph John Couture testified Friday that he beat and stabbed Trina Louise Langenbrunner to death on Sept. 3, 2000.
The posters of a smiling Langenbrunner advertising a $100,000 reward for the arrest and conviction of her killer that were posted around the Northland can finally be filed away.
Couture, 42, of Cloquet pleaded guilty to intentional second-degree murder, first-degree aiding and abetting aggravated witness tampering, and aiding and abetting first-degree arson.
Judge Dale Harris accepted the plea agreement and immediately sentenced Couture to nearly 40 years in prison.
Under terms of the plea agreement, Couture was sentenced to 32 years, 2 months, in prison on the murder conviction and 7 years, 2 months, in prison for the witness-tampering conviction, to be served one after the other. He was sentenced to 10 years, 9 months, in prison on the arson conviction, to be served at the same time as the murder conviction.
Langenbrunner, a 33-year-old mother of three, last was seen hitchhiking in the area of Brookston Road between 1:30 and 2 a.m. on Sept. 3, 2000. Couture was a neighbor of Langenbrunner at the time. The victim's beaten and stabbed body was discovered off a rural road in southern St. Louis County.
Couture told the court that he was on his way home after drinking at a couple of Cloquet establishments on the night of Sept. 2-3. He said he spotted Langenbrunner standing in the middle of the road and had to swerve to go around her. He said she asked him for a ride and he gave her one, but when she told him she wanted to go all the way to Grand Rapids he said he was too drunk to drive that far.
He said Langenbrunner became angry and put a knife in his face and threatened him. He said he was able to get the knife away from her and "stuck her." They were wrestling and he stuck her again and she fell down.
(Comment from Lloyd Wagner, 5-26-2014:   I read in the June 2012 News Tribune story when Couture was first arrested, that the unnamed witnesses said that Couture had his OWN knife, that he always carried in a sheath on his belt, that was never again seen after the murder. Well, maybe Trina Langenbrunner wrestled THAT knife out of his sheath, or maybe she always carried her own knife, too. But she got so angry about not getting a ride to Grand Rapids that she threatened a man considerably larger than her with a knife? Likely story, I guess.
Also, a story that prosecutors might use to assure Couture that the judge will be lenient (and save themselves a trial in which they had no real evidence, because they refused to LOOK at the real evidence pointing towards someone else, despite repeatedly being told) – because this scenario is pretty close to self-defense, here, don’t you think, instead of murder, (wink wink), maybe the judge will let you off, eh? (wink wink).
 However, in the original June 2012 story related in this post, the witness said that Couture claimed that HE himself made the first attack in anger at having being turned down for sex, that it “went brutal”, that he “whooped the dog-sh*t out of her”, etc., etc…. The story has completely changed between 2012 and 2013. )
The defendant, who was 5-foot-9, 210 pounds at the time, said the 5-5, 115-pound woman screamed and told him she was going to call the cops and tell them that he tried to kill her. He said he began hitting her in the face and stabbing her to shut her up. The victim had 29 stab entry wounds to her torso, face and back.
Assistant St. Louis County Attorney Jessica Smith asked Couture if it was his intent to shut the victim up for good by killing her. He said yes.
Under questioning by co-prosecutor Assistant St. Louis County Attorney Jon Holets, Couture admitted that he had conspired with his girlfriend, Sandra Couture, in an attempt to intimidate witnesses and dissuade them from testifying against him.
Sandra Couture pleaded guilty in April to aiding and abetting first-degree aggravated witness tampering and aiding and abetting first-degree arson in April and was sentenced to 9 1/2 years in prison. She admitted burning down the home of a relative of one of the witnesses against Joseph Couture.
(Comment by Lloyd Wagner 1-16-2015: Remember, this is the “arson fire” talked about in this post and this post – the ”arson fire” that was never reported in any media, and in which two dogs went missing and were presumed dead without leaving any skeletons behind, the “arson fire” in which a house plus two vehicles were destroyed but damages were less than $8,600, and the same “arson fire” that investigators figured out the Coutures did because they had discussed “going fishing” in a telephone conversation or in  notes held up to the jail window during a visit, the latter as related in this post. That “arson fire”.)
Public defender Cynthia Evenson read a statement to the court in which Joseph Couture apologized to the family of the victim and called himself a coward. The statement said that he understood that he would receive no forgiveness and that he would have to live with that. The defendant is also a convicted Level 3 sex offender.
He had been charged with sexually assaulting Langenbrunner when he murdered her, but that charge was dismissed as part of the plea agreement. Also as part of the plea agreement, the attorneys and the judge are supporting Couture's request that he serve his sentence outside of Minnesota.
(Comment by Lloyd Wagner, 5-26-2014: This may indeed be the reason that I read in the Prisoner Locator that Joseph Couture is not in a DOC facility. Someone suggested (jokingly, of course), that maybe they just took him to the Minnesota state line and gave him a wink, a nod, and a warning -- kind of like a “GOC” sort of thing, like Tom Hinze got so many, many times in this post. It sure is darned funny, though, that the “Case Worker” listed in the prisoner locator (in the screen shot above) was annoyed and claimed to know nothing at all about the people or the case.
Margaret Dupuis, mother of the victim, spoke for her family outside the courthouse.
"I just want to thank St. Louis County and Jessica (Smith) and everybody that has helped with this case getting solved finding the killer of my daughter," Dupuis said.
St. Louis County Attorney Mark Rubin read a prepared statement. He said his office credited the "unwavering commitment of law enforcement in the successful prosecution of this case. The St. Louis County Sheriff's Office and Bureau of Criminal Apprehension are to be commended for a job well done. Their compassionate perseverance ensured a just conclusion for this family and community."
THIS CONTENT CONTINUES ONTO THE NEXT PAGE...
·         1

·         2
Steve Steblay, now supervising deputy of the sheriff's Duluth office, was assigned to the case as an investigator on the day Langenbrunner was first reported missing. "We never gave up hope and we just continued on to do what we do and it finally got completed," Steblay said. "I guess I also wish to thank Trina's family. They never gave up on us. Their trust in us and their patience for all these years continued on and worked with us throughout the whole thing. So kudos to everyone involved with the conclusion of this case."
The sheriff's office said it followed up on just under 1,000 leads and conducted hundreds of interviews in investigating the case for nearly a dozen years before arresting Couture on June 15, 2012,. Two confidential witnesses helped make the case against him.
Court rules permit witnesses' names to remain confidential until they testify if the prosecutor files a written certificate with the trial court stating that to identify a witness may endanger the integrity of a continuing investigation or subject witnesses or other persons to physical harm.
The witnesses' names have not been made public and are protected by a court order.
(Comment from Lloyd Wagner, 5-26-2014:  I received no such protection. My life was threatened by Tom Hinze with no consequence to him whatsoever -- and in fact, he was released early from NERCC, right back into the rural neighborhood and allowed to leave the State of Minnesota, with no reporting requirements whatsoever -- and Trina Langenbrunner's daughter Shelley Tormanen actually threatened me with arrest by Interpol if I didn’t cease telling what I saw and heard in this case.)
It remains to be seen if they, or anyone, will collect the $100,000 reward that was offered for the arrest and conviction of Langenbrunner's murderer. Rubin and sheriff's deputies said the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension is in charge of the reward.
"The BCA will coordinate with the local law enforcement agencies to review how any information provided in this case led to today's outcome and identify those who are entitled to a reward," Jill Oliveira, public information officer for the BCA, said Friday.

Trina Louise (St. Germaine) Langenbrunner was born Sept. 12, 1966, in St. Paul and attended Humboldt High School there. She was a member of the Fond du Lac Band of Ojibwe and worked as a home health aide while living in Cloquet.
Copyright 2013 - Duluth News Tribune


  (Comment from Lloyd Wagner, 5-26-2014: Obviously, the anonymous unnamed witness will get no reward. Geez, I hope that the witnesses' relative’s house, vehicles and magical dogs were insured against arson, or that poor unrewarded witness will probably feel obligated to pay for the damages at his relative’s place, too, up to that $8,600 total reported in all of Carlton County in all of 2012 – (see screen grab below).
But then the unnamed relative of the unnamed witness may may eventually get paid back the money from the unreported-in-any-media arson fire, because eventually the Coutures may be able to earn enough money in prison to pay off their court-ordered “restitution” of exactly $34,845.00 each. (Please see screen grabs of the Couture’s court records for all the cases below. There are 13 screen grabs, in all. The ordered financial reimbursement is on the last page of the arson case for each person. Please notice, the "confessed" murder itself didn’t require any financial reimbursement, only the burning of that mysterious house, wherever it was never reported from.)
It's lucky the Carlton County deputies picked up the remains of those Molotov cocktails (broken bottles) that Sandra supposedly threw on July 19, 2012 (no fire reported in any newspaper, though, until weeks later), or the former homeowners might even get fined for having garbage in their yard, and then Coutures would eventually have to pay for that, too. (wink wink). 
Anyway, that is the end of this post. I will continue in a subsequent post, by relating how I finally located the whereabouts of Tom Hinze, though by the time I found him, he really WAS deceased.
Thank you for reading, and please stay tuned.