Friday, November 27, 2015

Correspondence with "Jaida Couture"

Thomas J. Hinze
 I had thought that I would stop with this blog, but on September 2, 2015 this brief conversation took place in the comments section of this post called "Confession to Murder"


Replies






  1. No, I don't. Read the whole blog from beginning to end, and you'll see clearly why I call bullsh*t on Litmans' case. The Sheriff should be locked up himself for concocting this case, and for turning Hinze loose without DNA-ing him.
    I was scared for my OWN life.
    How are you related to Joseph? I've never met him, but knew Hinze all TOO well. And Litman, too, for that matter.
    I tried to get in contact with Joseph but Corrections wouldn't even give me his address. (That's in the blog, too.)
    I also wrote a letter and mailed two separate copies of it to Sandra at Shakopee to ask why she and Joseph would confess to a fire that never even happened, but Shakopee must have confiscated those too, or at least she never answered. Here's the link to that post:
    http://formerlyfarmerly.blogspot.com/2015/03/letter-to-sandra-couture.html
    Delete
  2. If you'd rather, you can email me at lewagner2002@yahoo.com
    Delete
"Jaida" evidently would rather email me, and did so. Below is the record of the email conversation that took place between "Jaida" and myself between September 3 and September 26, 2015. 
I have been waiting since September 26 for "Jaida's aunt" to have enough of a respite in her "arthritis issues" to manage to tell "Jaida" the address of the "arson fire", so "Jaida" can tell me that address, so I can inform the Minnesota State Fire Inspectors and the two Sheriff's of that address ... and I'm STILL waiting. 
I have however, just now emailed the same Fire Inspectors and Sheriffs with the link to this post, to help them in their "active investigation" as to where the "arson fire" actually occurred (texts to those emails are below the emails back and forth with "Jaida"). Perhaps the Fire Inspectors or the Sheriffs can get the actual address of the "fire" from "Jaida's aunt" in person. I'll let my readers know if I hear anything!
(Damned funny the Inspectors or Sheriffs OR Jaida wouldn't know right offhand, huh? Actually, it's damned funny that the address of the "fire" wouldn't have been reported in the paper the very next morning after it supposedly happened. I've never heard of a secret fire, before.)
But anyway ......
I considered hiding "Jaida's" email address on this post, but decided against it -- as I don't believe that I was really corresponding with "Jaida Couture" at all, but with with someone else falsely using her name and a false email address to attempt to cover up the cover-up of the murder with some unbelievable nonsense, as below:
 jaida couture <pookey_2236@hotmail.com>

 Lloyd Wagner <lewagner2002@yahoo.com>

Thank you, I understand now. I guess that cabin certainly could have burned without the newspapers or TV channels hearing about it the next morning, and without the Fire District or Minnesota DPS EVER hearing about it or filing any reports. (They COULDN'T file any reports because then Joe and Sandra would have known where that cabin was and who the witness was, and then Joe and Sandra might do something to that witness if they knew where that cabin that they burned was.) Sure. And that's why the judge had to seal the name of the witness too. So Joe and Sandra wouldn't find out. 
Then after your grandfather moved out, Sandra still wasn't satisfied with just burning the cabin, two vehicles and 2 dogs, either, she went back with Molotov cocktails the second time, I suppose to burn some trees, or something? and REALLY scare your mom, this time.
And the dogs were "missing and presumed dead" in the fire. Sure, that happens to animals all the time, they don't leave skeletons or remains in a fire, they sit there wagging their tails patiently waiting for a hole to burn in the house just big enough for them to get out of, then they go running off and never come back. They just go missing, and then the Fire Inspectors have to presume them dead. Sure. Even if the Fire Inspectors can't even tell which county the fire occurred in.
And your mom knew all along that Joseph did that brutal bloody murder, but was too a-scared of him (or was it that you all still loved him so much?) to tell anyone or claim the reward while he was locked up in prison those almost 5 years for molesting your sister. It made more sense and was safer for her to wait until he got OUT to spill the beans. Sure.
And that was just total coincidence that TWO guys (1) both had size 11 or 12 New Balance shoes and (2) both had Chrysler or Plymouth mini-vans and (3) both burned clothes during the same week of the murder. And it was just good solid old-fashioned police detective work that caused Litman's department to refuse to DNA Tom Hinze, though they DNA'd a bunch of other people who didn't even HAVE anybody REPEATEDLY saying they saw them with size 11 or 12 New Balance shoes the week of the murder. Sure. That could easily be.
According to the newspaper, it was the witness, which would be your MOM, then, who bought the size 11 or 12 New Balance shoes. It would be interesting to know who in the family has size 11 or 12 feet. I tried to get the Public Defender's office to ask that question, but never got any satisfaction. Maybe you could tell me?
ALL that Litman would have had to do to prove Hinze innocent would have been to DNA-test him -- but he refused to do that. Why would he refuse? I suspect he refused because he was kind of hoping to kill two birds with one Hinze. I know I was afraid to go outside to my garden alone, after they let Hinze out into the heavily wooded and secluded Twig neighborhood where I lived, after just 5 months for his umpteenth DWI. But I went public.
Sorry, but all of this is a little too much for me to believe, especially when you ask me not to believe my own eyes and ears.
By the way, I did find the name Jaida Couture on Google, mentioned in a Reservation newspaper, and in the Cloquet area in 2008 and 2009 -- but I have absolutely no proof that you are actually Jaida Couture.
Still, I may add your comments into my blog, with my comments in red, and I may forward them on elsewhere, as well. If you have any further information and especially any confirmation that this is all true and that you are really Jaida Couture, I'd be glad to read it and report on it.
Thanks for your response.
Lloyd Wagner
 Lloyd Wagner <lewagner2002@yahoo.com>

Hi again Jaida,
As I indicated, the letter you wrote doesn't seem to jibe with reality, and so I have a little difficulty in believing that you are really Jaida Couture.
I've attempted to verify your identity with another person who also says he's a shirt-tail relative of Joseph Couture (through a relative of his being married to a step-daughter of Joseph's), but so far he hasn't answered me either.
If you do have any independent verification that your grandfather's cabin plus 2 vehicles were indeed burned and two dogs went "missing and presumed dead" and then Molotov cocktails were also thrown, please supply me with that verification, and I'll be happy to report it.
Otherwise, I'll continue by posting that I have received correspondence, but NO verification of its authenticity.
There is the additional matter of Joseph and Sandra being ordered to pay many thousands of dollars of restitution for a cabin that doesn't seem to have any address, and then the fact that it would seem your mother SHOULD have received a $100,000 reward for her information, as well.
I'd appreciate any comments, especially if they're accompanied with verification.
Thank you again,
Lloyd Wagner

jaida couture <pookey_2236@hotmail.com>

Lloyd Wagner <lewagner2002@yahoo.com>

 Lloyd Wagner <lewagner2002@yahoo.com>

 jaida couture <pookey_2236@hotmail.com>

 Lloyd Wagner <lewagner2002@yahoo.com>

Thank you. Maybe you could try calling your aunt with a telephone, or contact her via email or Facebook? Or even mail?
They still have like 1 or 2-day mail delivery there, don't they?
Otherwise, within a couple more days here, I'll just report that nobody in the witness's family knows where that "arson fire" took place, either.
AND that as far as you know, the nearly $70,000 restitution money being collected from Joseph and Sandra isn't being paid to anybody.
AND the reward wasn't paid to anybody you know of either.
And that besides the pair of size 11 or 12 New Balance shoes that I have REPEATEDLY reported seeing since way back in 2001, there was also ANOTHER pair the same size and brand that your mother bought for Joseph in 2000, and was listed by the Sheriff's Department as a clue in a bloody murder in September 2000.
And that your mother knew about that bloody murder and the shoes and the mini-van full of blood, but didn't say a word about it to anybody for almost 12 years, then waited until Joseph got out of prison for molesting your sister to speak up.
Is all that correct?
By the way, does Joseph have size 11 or 12 feet?
Thanks for all your info.
Lloyd Wagner

jaida couture <pookey_2236@hotmail.com>

 Lloyd Wagner <lewagner2002@yahoo.com>

Lloyd Wagner <lewagner2002@yahoo.com>

 jaida couture <pookey_2236@hotmail.com>

That was the end of my correspondence with "Jaida", and evidently her aunt still hadn't been able to answer her telephone.
Below is the email I just now sent to Kevin Radke and Richard Sellman of the State Fire Marshal Division of the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, and below that is the email I just now sent to Sheriff Litman (St. Louis County) and Sheriff Lake (Carlton County):
Lloyd Wagner <lewagner2002@yahoo.com>

 Lloyd Wagner <lewagner2002@yahoo.com>

And that's the end of this post. Thanks for staying tuned.
 

Thursday, July 9, 2015

DPS Inspector and Investigator Unable to Comment

Thomas J. Hinze
On July 7, at 12:41 a.m. (Indo-china time) I received the following response from Mr. Scott Radke, from the Minnesota State Fire Marshal Division, to my emails (quoted in the previous post). I'd first sent the email on June 15, then after receiving no reply for 3 weeks, I resent it on July 6.
Anyway, here's the reply I received on July 7:
  
To

Monday, June 15, 2015

Two Sheriffs Don't Care to Comment

Tom Hinze
 In my last post I included the text of the email I sent both to Sheriff Ross Litman (St. Louis County, MN), and to Sheriff Kelly Lake (Carlton County, MN), asking about the strange Cloquet "arson fire" of July 6, 2012. 
Actually, the last post included the text of the FIRST email I sent to both Sheriffs, on May 22, 2015. As I didn't receive any answer whatsoever, I re-sent the same email to both individuals on the first of June.
As of June 15, I've still received no answer from either of them, and I guess I can safely assume that I won't.
I've therefore sent the following email to two Fire Reporting officials from the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, namely, Mr. Scott Radke, who is listed on the DPS website as "Incident Reporting Inspector", and Mr. Richard Sellman, who is listed as "Investigator".
You may notice that the latter part of the email below is just a copy and paste of the same old email I wrote to the two Sheriffs. I'm getting a little tired of trying to put the same simple questions into new words!
I've already received an automated reply from Mr. Radke, as follows: 
Out of the Office - Returning Monday 6/22, Response maybe delayed
-Thanks Scott Radke
Hopefully, Mr. Sellman will be able to give us some information before next week, but if not, we'll just have to wait for Mr. Radke to return. 
It's damned funny that neither of the Sheriffs would know anything about this matter, though, eh? Duluth Police Chief Gordon Ramsay let me know that the Langenbrunner murder was not a Duluth case, and so he doesn't know anything about it ... It WAS a St. Louis County case, though -- I distinctly remember Sheriff Litman giving a press conference proudly announcing the "solving" of it.
Below is the correspondence I sent earlier today to the State Fire Marshal's investigator and inspector at the Minnesota Department of Public Safety:
 Lloyd Wagner